Infernicon

A social experiment. With breasts.

After my recent anti-mobile phone tirade, I have remembered that they're not entirely bad. Camera phones in particular have a definite benefit - you lot have definitely benefited from all the pictures of me that grace this journal, after all1.

Believe it or not, though, camera phones don't just exist to take pictures of me. They're an obscenely powerful tool for human social interaction. A person wielding a camera can get most people to obey his every command - that's a fairly well-known concept, but just apply it to the world we now live in; a world where we all2 possess our own cameras & carry them with us everywhere we go. Just think about what you can achieve with that power.

No, really think about it.

That is the true power of the modern mobile phone. When you're stood behind a viewfinder, you become a director - not just in your mind, but in the minds of everyone around you. Those in front of the lens will fucking scramble to do your bidding, without even thinking about what they're doing or why they're doing it. You've almost certainly been one of those people in front of the camera before, taking orders from someone for no reason other than he's the one holding the camera.

But you've got a camera of your own. Why shouldn't you be the one giving the orders?

There are probably a few doubters reading this - and that's understandable. You've gone through life taking direction, and it's quite scary to contemplate another way of life - to think about giving direction. But I have proof of the power a camera phone operator wields.

The Experiment

Does a man with a camera phone really wield Supreme Authoritative Power over those he captures within his viewfinder?

The Setup

The Equipment : A mobile phone with a decent camera, dashing good looks & faith in the power of the viewfinder.
The Setting : A pub, Manchester.
The Questions : "Can I take a photo of your breasts?" , "Whose breasts don't I have a picture of yet?"

The Proof




Conclusions

I was right! People will obey a man with a camera (phone) even when he asks for a photo of their tits.

However, this is obviously a small sample group and further data is required...

Follow-up

It occurs to me that pretty much everyone reading this owns a camera of some description. Many of you will be sat before its lens as we speak - that pretty much puts me squarely in the directorial position again3. It also occurs to me that there are quite a few of you - enough to make up a decent sample group. And if you link this experiment4 to the people on your friendslists... (all in the interests of science, you understand).

So : Can I see a photo of your breasts?

EDIT : Remember - this experiment is all about volunteering your breasts in the name of science, so if you are some kind of luddite who doesn't wish to participate, please inform your friends of this study. Don't deny them their chance for greatness. Thankyou.

-
1Ok, so you got those before I had a decent camera phone, but the pics are better now.
2Except, apparently, [info]theegoatpig...
3Look, it does. Don't argue. This is Science.
4That's what it is, by the way. It's not just some sort of lame excuse to look at tits or anything. This is Science, remember?

Comments

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
http://www.stickam.com/

Seriously. The power of the camera is far greater than a few boobs. People can be talked into almost anything, even when they're the ones technically wielding the camera.
Baby steps, darth.

Stage 1: Breasts.

I'll think about what stage 2 once I've analysed all the stage 1 data.
Let me get this straight. My journal doesn't show you enough breasts? You require more of me? Hm....
Your journal only shows picturse of other peoples' breasts.

That's an entirely different branch of pornography science.
No.
But... science!

It's not for me.
My camera broke :(
the_pilchard broke it with his miiiind.
BUT I DO have a picture of my teacup titties stored on my computer.
Behold:

Oh, wait, you have PROBABLY seen that pic a few dozen times.
nevermind
I don't think I have actually...

(still haven't)

Icon for the spirit of "science".
Your contribution to the field is greatly appreciated.

My contribution

Re: My contribution

Excellent.

(I bet you could get a few of your friends to participate as well...)
so. how exactly is this in the name of science again?
It's sociology.
dashing good looks
So who did you get to take the pictures? ;p

*points to icon* Cause one follows the director...;D
Cheek!

If you weren't an experimental subject, I'd be all offended...

(Remember to encourage participation by people who might not be aware of this - I'd like to see just how many people we can get involved. In the interests of science.)
Hmm, can't say I have this experience of cameras.

Indeed, it's got to the point where I just scrupulously avoid taking pictures with any humans in view simply because I'm tired of some fucker barely visible in the background coming up and demanding I delete some picture which had nothing to do with them just because they were in it or else they'll call the cops.

This is particularly annoying, since I'm actually a damn good photographer.
Unless Australian law is very different to British law (which would be unusual), tell them to go ahead & call the cops. They'll be done for wasting police time.

If they're hanging around in a public place then you're allowed to photograph them, just like you're allowed to look at them & listen to them. These are the risks we take when we leave our homes...
Sure, here you go...
Oh wait, here's a better one...
May you take a picture of me breasts? No, and please excuse me while I ram that camera-phone down your throat.
If you'd like to pass my request on to any of your friends...
I'm pushing back the boundaries of science, me.
Science!
The only people reading my journal are the same people reading yours. It really is quite redundant for me to link them back here.

Now, to truely test this theory, you have to get an AVERAGE man to use his camera phone, and see how many women go for the tit-shot then. That will prove beyond a reasonable doubt if it is the phone, or just your stunning good looks that get the job done.
Boob icon for you
ooh, two for the price of one.

Well, four for the price of two.
I already got my tits out for everyone on my friends list, so feel free to add that to the pile.
Only counts as part of the experiment if it's added to the thread.
[info]hippiecrap does this everytime I see him out. I warn him not to come near me. My boyfriend hates his guts! After couple of pints he tries the upskirt thing too. He's the main reason I don't wear skirts in town anymore.
Does he ask or just try to take pics, though?

There's a definite distinction. Taking pics without asking just makes you a sad old perv. Women asking you to photograph their baps makes you a god amongst men.

A scientific god
there we go. Just to add to your science experiment.
Thankyou!
mmmmBreasts. Sorry, what was that other bit? Sci-something?
Remember that you can participate in this noble venture yourself, and encourage others to do so...

In the interests of breasts science.
I already posted a picture of my breast on the blog ages ago. I psychically pre-empted your request.
It's not part of The Experiment (yeah, it deserves capital letters now) unless it's posted in this here entry.

(Pimp it, as well. You know you want to. It's Science!)
*Follows link from [info]scarletdemons journal
I'm sorry, I have no breasts for you, but I have added you to my friends list as a consolation prize.
Spreading the word of my grand and/or noble endeavour is perhaps more important pictures of your own.

Subtle, aren't I?
I always knew that at some point a picture of my breasts would be published, I just thought I'd get paid for it.
You're being paid in Science, lass.
I almost forgot to participate properly in my own experiment :



Science!
In the interest of science, of course

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
Of course.

science!

Re: science!

Science it is.

That's still the wrong colour rose, though.
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>